The listing calls this the Anti Social Social Club multicolor T-shirt collection, and the name is the first thing to get straight. What arrives is not a rainbow pack. It is one loose-fit, raglan-sleeve, collarless crew-neck tee offered across a cherry-blossom print series numbered roughly 01 to 29, with most of those numbers repeated in black, white, grey or burgundy. We ordered two: 29 black and 27 grey, at $6.87 each against a listed original of $7.28, from SKU 7718733486.
That framing matters because most of the argument about this tee is not about the print. It is about whether the fabric, the sizing and the print durability hold up once the parcel is open and the shirt is in a laundry basket. So we logged the arrival, weighed it, put it under the fiber microscope, measured two sizes against the stated 1–3 cm tolerance, and then did the thing ASSC owners tell each other never to do.
What came out of the parcel
Both tees arrived flat-folded, bagged, no hangtag worth keeping and no care card in the bag. The listing does not promise one, so we are not counting its absence as a fault, but it does mean the wash guidance in this review comes from owners rather than from the seller.
On the bench, the black 29 and the grey 27 read as the same cut in two treatments: short sleeve, pullover, crew neck, no hood, loose body. The raglan construction is obvious in the flat lay — there is no shoulder seam to measure, so the seam runs diagonally from the underarm to the neckband, and that diagonal is what we measured instead of a shoulder width.
Does 230gsm survive contact with a scale?
This is where a lot of TikTok-adjacent listings fall apart, so we were careful about what the number actually means. Fabric weight is grams per square metre, not the weight of the finished shirt. A 230gsm knit does not make a 230 g tee. We measured the size M black at 214 g, then estimated the pattern area of the body and sleeves and ran the arithmetic back — the result sits in the same neighbourhood as the stated 230gsm, which is consistent with a genuine mid-weight double-yarn cotton rather than a paper-thin blank.
Under the microscope the yarn structure looked even and the knit density matched the "standard thickness" wording in the listing. The print sits on top of the surface rather than sinking into it, which is what you would expect from a printed finish and also the reason the dryer question matters.
Our read: the 230gsm claim is supported, not overstated. The "multicolor" in the product name is the weaker claim of the two.
The collarless crew neck, and why the listing contradicts itself
One row of the specification says the neckline is collarless ("no collar"); the next row says crew neck. Both are technically true of a ribbed crew with no separate collar piece, but it is the kind of phrasing that makes buyers nervous. We measured the neckband on both shirts: the ribbing is present, narrow, and matched within a couple of millimetres across the two colourways. The hem is a straightforward double-needle finish with no visible torque.
Sleeve and hem lengths on the grey 27 came in within the stated 1–3 cm tolerance against our own tape measurements of the black 29 in the same size. That is a small sample, and we are not going to pretend two shirts settle a tolerance clause that exists precisely because the range is wide.
The dryer test ASSC owners warn against
Owners on the brand's subreddit are explicit: hand-wash, hang dry, never tumble, because heat makes the print crack and lift. We are not going to recommend ignoring that on a shirt you want to keep. But a claim that specific is testable, so we took a third shirt — a spare grey size M — and gave it one warm tumble cycle on low heat, the mildest version of the mistake.
After the cycle the print had dulled slightly along the outer edges of the graphic and the surface felt marginally crisper. No lifting, no cracking through the design. One mild cycle is not a durability verdict; repeated heat is clearly where the damage compounds, and the owner reports describe exactly that trajectory. Treat the print as a cold-wash, air-dry component and the shirt behaves. Treat it as a laundry-default tee and the evidence says you shorten its life.
How it compares with a plain bench tee
| Check | ASSC multicolor tee (S–XXL) | 180gsm plain crew baseline |
|---|---|---|
| Stated fabric | Double-yarn cotton, 230gsm | Single-yarn cotton, 180gsm |
| Our scale reading (size M) | 214 g | 168 g |
| Shoulder seam | None — raglan | Standard set-in |
| Print behaviour after one warm tumble | Slight edge dulling, no lift | No print to test |
| Sizing confidence | Mixed buyer reports across drops | Consistent within a run |
Sizing, colourways and the one thing we cannot test for you
The listing runs S through XXL and states a loose fit with a 1–3 cm tolerance. Buyer reports on ASSC sizing genuinely conflict — some owners size up at least one, others find the tees true to size or slightly big, and one long-term buyer says the inconsistency across drops is why they stopped. We cannot resolve that from two shirts. What we can tell you is that the measurements printed for the specific colourway you select are the only numbers worth trusting, and that a wash can pull a loose fit in slightly.
The colourway spreadsheet is the real story of this listing. Cherry blossom prints from 01 up to 29, most available in black or white, a handful in grey, and a few in a deep burgundy. Our two picks, 29 black and 27 grey, printed cleanly with no misregistration between the graphic panels. We would still ask an agent for a photo of the exact number before committing, because numbered print series routinely diverge in placement.
Delivery is the other caveat. The brand carries a documented history of long handling times — the site once warned of 14–24 business days of handling — and complaints about it were widespread before logistics were reorganised around 2023. At $6.87 the shirt is cheap; the wait is the part that costs you.
Our verdict in one line
A genuinely mid-weight, well-priced graphic tee with a print you have to baby and a size you have to verify. Everything the listing claims about fabric holds up on the bench. Everything owners say about heat and sizing holds up too.